Hello,
Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivili...@iki.fi> wrote:
> Is LLI variant really needed? This looks the same as the
> _gcry_mpih_add_n.
You are right. It is not needed, actually. I overlooked.
I'm going to fix it by:
#define _gcry_mpih_add_lli _gcry_mpih_add_n
> I think we should remove obsolete ones in favor of just using the
> generic
> version. I'd just keep assembly for following architectures:
> - amd64
> - i386
> - aarch64
> - arm
> - generic
>
> We could then validate that these really have constant time (or LLI)
> implementations.
Agreed.
For the schedule, I think it should be done for 1.12. I don't think
this kind of removal/cleanup is not needed for next revision (1.11.1).
--
_______________________________________________
Gcrypt-devel mailing list
Gcrypt-devel@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel
