On 12/11/06, Eric Hellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there's no expense- you need to urldecode values anyway if you want > to do anything with them. > Yes, the values should be url encoded!
This is false. This assumes that the ContextObject is being transported across the wire and I don't think it's safe to make these sorts of assumptions. This is my only point. There needs to a consistent, standard way to write a COinS. No, it doesn't matter which it is, but regexps, XPaths, etc. would be much, much simpler if the author knows what to look for. -Ross. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "gcs-pcs-list" group. To post to this group, send email to gcs-pcs-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gcs-pcs-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---