On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Jonathan M. Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 01:29, Dan Chudnov <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Jonathan M. Lane wrote:
>>
>>> I think it might be time to revise unAPI to encourage (preferably mandate, 
>>> but that's probably unrealistic) the use of the value class pattern, which 
>>> is a proven microformat pattern that does not have the same accessibility 
>>> issues as the ABBR design pattern.
>>
>> Thanks for bringing this up.  Sorry for the delayed response.
>>
>> I haven't been tuned in to microformats in a while.  Is this the pattern 
>> you're referring to?
>>
>>  http://microformats.org/wiki/value-class-pattern
>
> Exactly right.
>
>> I'm not sure there's a lot to gain from updating unAPI at this point.  Are 
>> you using it?
>
> I am not using it myself, but I work closely with the technical
> library at my institutional library, who are actively maintaining some
> unAPI access points on some of their services and systems.
>
> While unAPI may be past it's prime (I am not certain if unAPI has been
> replaced by something newer/more appealing), updating the standard to
> recommend the use of a more accessibility-friendly and semantically
> correct microformat would be beneficial for anyone still using unAPI
> or those considering implementing it.
>
> Any reasons why it may not be worth updating the standard to use the
> value-class-pattern microformat?
>

Evergreen (http://evergreen-ils.org/) uses unAPI extensively, so we
wouldn't want to see the abbr-title pattern removed, but I don't see
any reason to avoid aligning the spec with the value-class pattern a
bit in terms of supported implementation.

Note, though, that the value for unAPI is a tag: URI, not human-usable
data, so it may be less applicable to unAPI than, say, hCard.  My
$0.02 ...

-- 
Mike Rylander
 | VP, Research and Design
 | Equinox Software, Inc. / Your Library's Guide to Open Source
 | phone:  1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
 | email:  [email protected]
 | web:  http://www.esilibrary.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"gcs-pcs-list" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/gcs-pcs-list?hl=en.

Reply via email to