gdal-dev  

Messages by Thread

• [gdal-dev] 2026 GDAL Sponsorship Program Funding Appeal Howard Butler via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Fwd: About organizing a general strike Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] [PROJ] Fwd: About organizing a general strike Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] [PROJ] Fwd: About organizing a general strike Michael Sumner via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Indexing lots of remote COGs for use with gdal raster clip and QGIS Robin Wilson via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Indexing lots of remote COGs for use with gdal raster clip and QGIS Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Indexing lots of remote COGs for use with gdal raster clip and QGIS Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Michael via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Michael via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Can c++ types be used directly from the SWIG interfaces? Howard Butler via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] RFC 101 thread-safe raster datasets and vsimem? Sean Gillies via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 101 thread-safe raster datasets and vsimem? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] NITF writer: FILE TRE related corruption in GDAL 3.13.0 to 3.13.3 Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• Re: [gdal-dev] gdal-dev Digest, Vol 267, Issue 6 Bhanu Gundugollu via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.3 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Tom Moore via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Barry DeZonia via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Barry DeZonia via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Tom Moore via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Barry DeZonia via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Barry DeZonia via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Tom Moore via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoIdentifyEPSG() fails on standard ESRI-dialect NAD83/UTM .prj (proj_identify succeeds); FindMatches() also missing from Java bindings Tom Moore via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.2 RC1 available and motion to adopt it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] VRT File Support Within a Zstd-Compressed Zip Jordan Dauble via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] VRT File Support Within a Zstd-Compressed Zip Jordan Dauble via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] VRT File Support Within a Zstd-Compressed Zip Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Fwd: CF Convention workshop 2026 @ ECMWF Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: CF Convention workshop 2026 @ ECMWF Alan Snow via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Bug reading a byn file for Canadian geoid model? Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Bug reading a byn file for Canadian geoid model? Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Bug reading a byn file for Canadian geoid model? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Bug reading a byn file for Canadian geoid model? Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] confused about coordinate dimension Richard Greenwood via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] confused about coordinate dimension Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] confused about coordinate dimension Richard Greenwood via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Meaning of GDAL's git "stable" branch Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Meaning of GDAL's git "stable" branch Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Meaning of GDAL's git "stable" branch Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] 2.5D vs Z in ogrConstants Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] 2.5D vs Z in ogrConstants Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Python bindings: aliasing gdal.Open and gdal.OpenEx Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Python bindings: aliasing gdal.Open and gdal.OpenEx Vincent Schut via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Python bindings: aliasing gdal.Open and gdal.OpenEx Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Python bindings: aliasing gdal.Open and gdal.OpenEx Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Sebastiaan Couwenberg via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Optional rust library as a dependency of the Zarr driver Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Crash in GEOS iterating through the layers in a PBF-file loaded with the MVT driver in GDAL 3.12.4#2 Roman Plöhn via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Crash in GEOS iterating through the layers in a PBF-file loaded with the MVT driver in GDAL 3.12.4#2 Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Crash in GEOS iterating through the layers in a PBF-file loaded with the MVT driver in GDAL 3.12.4#2 Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Crash in GEOS iterating through the layers in a PBF-file loaded with the MVT driver in GDAL 3.12.4#2 Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Crash in GEOS iterating through the layers in a PBF-file loaded with the MVT driver in GDAL 3.12.4#2 Kai Pastor via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.1 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available Scott via gdal-dev
  • [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 (Re: GDAL 3.13.1 RC1 available) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Status and future of the GDAL GNM and image correlator Alexander Bruy via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Status and future of the GDAL GNM and image correlator Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Status and future of the GDAL GNM and image correlator Michael Sumner via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] How to convert large VRT mosaics into STAC? Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] How to convert large VRT mosaics into STAC? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GeoJSON: Why "application/vnd.geo+json" as media type? Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GeoJSON: Why "application/vnd.geo+json" as media type? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] AutoCreateWarpedVRT missing latitude clamping heuristic for Mercator projections Denis Rykov via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] AutoCreateWarpedVRT missing latitude clamping heuristic for Mercator projections Michael Sumner via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 build issue on Windows Fengting Chen via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Using GMT CPT file with gdal raster color Sean King via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Using GMT CPT file with gdal raster color Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Daniel Morissette via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt revised RFC 111 LLM tool policy Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] OGRLayer::WriteArrowBatch() and CreateFeature() mutually exclusive in the same session Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] OGRLayer::WriteArrowBatch() and CreateFeature() mutually exclusive in the same session Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] OGRLayer::WriteArrowBatch() and CreateFeature() mutually exclusive in the same session Chris Toney via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] clang-tidy 23 bugprone-signed-bitwise and CPL_LSBINT32PTR macros Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 "Iowa City" is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Kai Pastor, DG0YT via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? ElPaso via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Re-organizing source tree regarding drivers? Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Frank Warmerdam via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Daniel Morissette via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: grant push rights to Paul Harwood Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Komяpa
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • [gdal-dev] Even Rouault <[email protected]> Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Komяpa
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Chris Toney via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Andrew Bell via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] RFC111 AI/LLM tool policy: proposal for a significant revision Daniel Evans via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Howard Butler via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Daniel Baston via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: approve GDAL 3.13.0 rc2 as final release Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 RC2 available (Re: GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available) Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 release candidate available Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Two resolutions for one GTI Peter Schmitt via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Two resolutions for one GTI Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Two resolutions for one GTI Scott via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Motion : Accept RFC 112 - Remove Mono MCS support from the CMAKE scripts. Paul Harwood via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion : Accept RFC 112 - Remove Mono MCS support from the CMAKE scripts. Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion : Accept RFC 112 - Remove Mono MCS support from the CMAKE scripts. Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion : Accept RFC 112 - Remove Mono MCS support from the CMAKE scripts. Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Motion : Accept RFC 112 - Remove Mono MCS support from the CMAKE scripts. Michael Smith via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] /vsicurl, curl and wget Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] /vsicurl, curl and wget Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] /vsicurl, curl and wget Scott via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] /vsicurl, curl and wget Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] /vsicurl, curl and wget Andrew C Aitchison via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 is released Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] Compound CRS Norman Barker via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Compound CRS Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Compound CRS Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Greg Troxel via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Laurențiu Nicola via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] Fwd: Re: brainstorming: moving away from github? Sandro Santilli via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Alexandre Gacon via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Sandro Santilli via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] brainstorming: moving away from github? Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.13.0 beta2 available Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 rc1 available; motion to approve it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 rc1 available; motion to approve it Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 rc1 available; motion to approve it Michael Smith via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 rc1 available; motion to approve it Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GDAL 3.12.4 rc1 available; motion to approve it Even Rouault via gdal-dev
• [gdal-dev] GPKG footprint of ratser data shrinks as zoom level decreases Philippe Ghesquiere via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GPKG footprint of ratser data shrinks as zoom level decreases Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev
  • Re: [gdal-dev] GPKG footprint of ratser data shrinks as zoom level decreases Philippe Ghesquiere via gdal-dev

• Earlier messages