On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Frank Warmerdam <[email protected]> wrote: > Oyvind Idland wrote: >> >> Hi Ralf, >> >> full 3D/volumetric objects was not what I was refering to. I mean >> "2.5D", simple features >> with Z (and M) ordinates. >> >> If I understand correct, this is what Adam is refering to in his proposal. >> >> SQL/MM do specify Z and M geometries (plus circular geometries). > > ... > >>> Am Donnerstag 16 September 2010 14:03:09 schrieb Oyvind Idland: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> been taking a look at "Adam's 2.5D simple features proposal" at the OGR >>>> website. > > Oyvind, > > I would note that Adam's proposal was from around the year 2000 and was used > in OGR for many years until OGC/ISO decided to use different codes for 2.5D > in WKB despite the fact that Adam's proposal had been adopted by OGC. > > There has been some effort to support the new numbering scheme but I'm not > exactly sure what OGR produces by default not. > > Best regards, > -- > ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, > [email protected] > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Programmer for Rent > >
Ok, thanks, that makes sense. Seems like OGC/ISO chose a somewhat different encoding though. -- Oyvind _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
