Yes, it is ok for you to download and test. This is OSM data that I created using ArcCatalog 10.
Jeff also has a layer of US States that I created from OGR. It did have the extents. Mike -- Mike Michael Smith Remote Sensing/GIS Center US Army Corps of Engineers On 7/13/11 2:54 PM, "Paul Ramsey" <[email protected]> wrote: >The fact that sometimes you can see an extent (when you create a FGDB >with OGR) seems to indicate a complexity beyond the driver simply not >reading extents... are you certain this FGDB file has extents set? I >assume it's OK for me to download it and test. > >P. > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jeff McKenna ><[email protected]> wrote: >> More feedback on the FileGDB driver: >> >> - we're trying to access an OSM road network for Colorado, stored in fgb >> format, created with ArcCatalog 10.0 >> (ftp://ftp.usace.army.mil/pub/erdc/crrel/rsgis/osm_colo_roads.zip) >> >> - using gdal-trunk and FileGDB_API_1_0Final >> >> - when executing ogrinfo for some reason the EXTENT is not displayed in >>the >> results, such as: >> >> {{{ >> ogrinfo osm_colo_roads.gdb united_states_united_states_colorado_highway >>-so >> INFO: Open of `osm_colo_roads.gdb' >> using driver `FileGDB' successful. >> >> Layer name: united_states_united_states_colorado_highway >> Geometry: Multi Line String >> Feature Count: 106940 >> Layer SRS WKT: >> GEOGCS["WGS 84", >> DATUM["WGS_1984", >> SPHEROID["WGS 84",6378137,298.257223563, >> AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]], >> AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]], >> PRIMEM["Greenwich",0, >> AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]], >> UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433, >> AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]], >> AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]] >> FID Column = OBJECTID >> Geometry Column = SHAPE >> TYPE: String (0.0) >> NAME: String (0.0) >> ONEWAY: String (0.0) >> LANES: Real (0.0) >> }}} >> >> Has anyone else noticed this? (testing with OGR-created fgb seems to >>output >> extents fine) >> >> Thanks. >> >> -jeff >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeff McKenna >> MapServer Consulting and Training Services >> http://www.gatewaygeomatics.com/ >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> >_______________________________________________ >gdal-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
