On 17 November 2011 21:31, Frank Warmerdam <[email protected]> wrote: > o RFC 8 on coding guidelines and such is *not* adopted and > in any event it would be advisory and I would not try to apply > it to essentially external code.
I assumed the issue is with driver code, which is proposed to be included in GDAL. > o Code with names and comments in Norwegian, or any > non-English language is going to be harder to support. That's what I meant. > If it just works this might not matter, and if there is a developer > who does understand it who is willing to support it that is great. ...people come and go, but code stays. > I would not be inclined to exclude code just because the > comments and variables are in a different language - > particularly in a driver where expectations are often more relaxed > than in the core. Understood. > From my perspective, I'm inclined to take a fairly relaxed > view of code standards and other requirements on driver > code. Thanks for clarification Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
