Le dimanche 11 décembre 2011 17:09:06, [email protected] a écrit : > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:33:58 +0100, Even Rouault wrote > > > Hi Sandro, > > > > I'm OK with your patch. I guess that the name of the > > GML_SQLITE_CACHE_MB config option must come from your work with your > > previous GML patch, but I'd suggest to rename it to OGR_SQLITE_CACHE > > as it is more general. Are you OK with that ? > > all right, that's fine for me > > > I'll also add a note in ogr2ogr man page about the -gt option, > > moving part of your proposed doc in it. > > really good
Commited in r23528 and in r23529. > > > By the way, you didn't react to my comments on your GML patch. > > Perhaps you are working on a revised patch ? > > oh yes, you guessed this ;-) > I hope to be able to ship you a strongly revised > GML patch ASAP > > just a quick preview: following your wise suggestions > about extensively using CPLXMLNode as far as possible, > I've introduced some further optimization and strongly > simplified the temporary SQL support. > > and now a 3GB GML file ise succesfully parsed in > about half an hour (50% less than before) Great ! > > bye Sandro _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
