Thank you guys for your quick response. Unless I hear otherwise from
someone else then we'll go with #3.
Daniel
On 12-02-07 4:56 PM, Howard Butler wrote:
On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Le mardi 07 février 2012 22:49:34, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Morissette
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi GDAL PSC,
The Seattle Sprint has a surplus this year and is offering the
participants three options to deal with part of the surplus. I am
emailing to ask what the PSC wants to do with respect to the
registration paid by GDAL for Brian Case.
The options are:
1- Take a reimbursement of 100-150$ (that would go back to GDAL's budget)
2- Leave it to 2012: Turn down the reimbursement and let your share of
the surplus be split between the other sprinters from this year who
choose to take the reimbursement
3- Leave it to 2013: Turn down the reimbursement and leave your share as
part of the surplus that will be passed to the 2013 sprint in Boston
Any preference? I would be leaning towards #3...
Daniel,
#3 is fine with me.
+1 for #3
+1 for #3_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
