Rutger,

There are some notes on this on the wiki too,
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/UserDocs/GdalWarp#GeoTIFFoutput-coCOMPRESSisbroken

Regards, Eli

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Rutger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for the tip, i wasn't aware of the -wo flags. Im testing it right now,
> but at 20% its already taking 20 minutes, so its certainly not very
> practical, but im curious of the result.
>
> For comparison, the earlier mentioned gdalwarp operation takes 72 seconds,
> running gdal_translate after it takes another 11 seconds. :)
>
> I noticed some bugfixes from 5 and 6 years ago mentioning compression and
> gdalwarp, but for a case of lots of small files. Maybe that would be a
> situation where the extra flag would be useful.
>
>
> Regards,
> Rutger
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/gdalwarp-with-packbits-compression-output-too-large-tp5001731p5001737.html
> Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to