Hey all, Have there been any more thoughts on XYZM support? I may be in a position to help fund some of this work in 2013.
David On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Ari Jolma <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/18/2012 08:51 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote: > >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Ari Jolma<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> The deadline for 2.0 is at the end of this year: >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/**milestone/2.0.0<http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/milestone/2.0.0> >>> >> Ari, >> >> Lets not take this deadline too seriously. If it takes >> till summer 2013 for 2.0 that is ok (IMHO). >> > > Deadlines are usually good ;) > > but I have no problem with this. If it takes longer then it takes longer. > > > >> Is the RFC list the best source for what new features are planned for it? >>> >>> This page is about smaller issues for 2.0: >>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/**wiki/GDAL20Changes<http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GDAL20Changes> >>> >>> I have an old wish to have full XYZM support in GDAL and it would be a >>> good >>> candidate to the plan for 2.0 - see also >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/**[email protected]/**msg13470.html<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13470.html> >>> Is anybody doing a review of what it would take? >>> >> I believe XYZM support would be a great feature for 2.0 and ideally >> would be part of an upgrade to the more recent "simple features geometry" >> model that includes various other geometry types. >> >> I'm not sure who might want to take on this task though. It isn't >> currently a focus of mine even though I'd like to see it happen. >> >> We aren't really a Roadmap kind of project, but I welcome discussion >> of things we would like to accomplish in 2.0 which is our opportunity >> for substantial changes. >> > > I could do two things: > > Edit the "smaller issues" page to contain also larger issues (as the link > to it on the main page says). > > Begin a XYZM RFC. > > Ari > > >> Best regards, >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev> > -- ************************************ David William Bitner
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
