Thanks very much for looking into this.  I've filed the bug at 
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4894



On 13/11/2012, at 10:02 PM, Jean-Claude Repetto <[email protected]> wrote:

> Le 13/11/2012 01:03, Nik Sands a écrit :
>> Thanks for the replies so far.  Unfortunately, adding a 3rd calibration 
>> point to the .map file has not helped.  Of course I'm assuming that the 
>> added calibration point is valid (eg, I tried the one suggested below, which 
>> looks like it should be OK).
>> 
>> Does anybody have any other suggestions as to why this .map file cannot be 
>> interpreted correctly by GDAL?
>> 
>> Is it a bug, or an incomplete .map parsing implementation, or am I doing 
>> something wrong?
> 
> Hi Nik,
> 
> I have looked at the Ozi driver source code, and found that the UTM 
> projection is not supported.
> Please file a bug (https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/), provide some sample files, 
> and I'll try to improve the driver.
> 
> Jean-Claude
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to