On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Frank Warmerdam <warmer...@pobox.com>wrote:
> Sam, > > It looks good to me, though I'm dubious about the value of treating > booleans as Byte instead of integer. > everywhere else booleans are defined as integers like this int bSomeVar; > > Best regards, > Frank > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Sam Gillingham > <gillingham....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I propose a motion to get RFC 40 - "Improving performance of Raster >> Attribute Table implementation for large tables" adopted. This adds some >> new functionality for GDAL 2.0. Even and others have made suggestions and >> these have been incorporated into the RFC: >> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc40_enhanced_rat_support >> >> Thanks, >> Sam. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gdal-dev mailing list >> gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >> > > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, > warmer...@pobox.com > light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam > and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
