> > Even, > > I see the ecw_29 test case your introduced in r26176 (for #4822) now fails. > The current results seem to supersample in a different way that GDAL > normally would - an off by a half issue that think is a reasonable > interpretation of how to supersample. Should the test be modified with a > different case for ECW 5? Or perhaps the test is just too fragile to be > worthwhile?
I've fixed ecw_29 and ecw_41. -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
