Le samedi 24 août 2013 19:57:47, Kurt Schwehr a écrit : > LGTM with respect to fink package on mac osx 10.8 > > - Looks like I have a todo on jasper. > - not sure on http_4 > - png.py and test_gdalwarp below. > - rest are flagged as know issues or pre-release things
Hi Kurt, Thanks for your testing. Comments below > > -kurt > > > ------------ Failures ------------ > Script: ogr/ogr_shape.py > TEST: ogr_shape_68 ... fail > line 3249: fail Yes, I observed that it fails on Travis too on the Mac. Not sure why being not in a position to debug on the Mac. Advanced stuff, not critical if it doesn't work > Script: gcore/basic_test.py > TEST: basic_test_8 ... fail Same, fails on Travis for unknown reason on the Mac. The test is likely a bit fragile. > line 161: fail > Script: gcore/gdal_api_proxy.py > TEST: gdal_api_proxy_3 ... fail Same, fails on Travis for unknown reason on the Mac. Advanced stuff, not critical if it doesn't work > Script: gdrivers/gdalhttp.py > TEST: http_4 ... fail Might be linked to a temporary unavailability of the remote resource. I somehow remember that it can fail sometimes, but I have never tested on the Mac, so it might not be just an interminent failure Does "gdalinfo /vsicurl/ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/cantopo/250k_tif/MCR2010_01.tif"; repeatedly fail ? You can try adding "--debug CPL_CURL_VERBOSE YES" for more info. > Script: gdrivers/jpeg2000.py > TEST: jpeg2000_8 ... fail > line 189: Jasper library would need patches Yes, this is a defect in upstream jasper that most linux distro have patched. Applying Debian patches might help you fix that > Script: gdrivers/png.py > TEST: png_1 ... fail > line 429: Checksum for band 1 in "test.png" is 6846, but expected > 57921. TEST: png_2 ... fail > line 484: Failed to create test file using CreateCopy method. > libpng: No IDATs written into file Hum, this is new to me. Which libpng version do you use ? > Script: utilities/test_gdalwarp.py > TEST: test_gdalwarp_33 ... fail The test might be a bit fragile indeed. It might depend on the libjpeg version you are using. There's a tolerance at 37, and you have reached 40. Could likely be changed to 40. > ---------------------------------- > > Succeeded: 2608 > Failed: 8 (0 blew exceptions) > Skipped: 723 > Expected fail:12 > Duration: 06m4.3s > As GDAL_DOWNLOAD_TEST_DATA environment variable is not defined, 107 tests > relying on data to downloaded from the Web have been skipped As > GDAL_RUN_SLOW_TESTS environment variable is not defined, 22 "slow" tests > have been skipped > > > png.py: > > python png.py > TEST: png_1 ... ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back > ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y offset > 29 ERROR 1: GetBlockRef failed at X block offset 0, Y block offset 29 > ERROR 3: Checksum value couldn't be computed due to I/O read error. > > fail > line 429: Checksum for band 1 in "test.png" is 6846, but expected > 57921. TEST: png_2 ... ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far > back ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y > offset 29 ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back > ERROR 1: data/test.png, band 1: IReadBlock failed at X offset 0, Y offset > 30 ERROR 1: libpng: IDAT: invalid distance too far back > > > > TEST: test_gdalwarp_32 ... success > TEST: test_gdalwarp_33 ... Diff at pixel (160, 0) : 7.000000 > Diff at pixel (161, 0) : 1.000000 > Diff at pixel (162, 0) : 6.000000 > Diff at pixel (165, 0) : 2.000000 > Diff at pixel (167, 0) : 8.000000 > Diff at pixel (169, 0) : 8.000000 > Diff at pixel (173, 0) : 4.000000 > Diff at pixel (174, 0) : 9.000000 > Diff at pixel (176, 0) : 9.000000 > Diff at pixel (189, 0) : 10.000000 > Diff at pixel (266, 0) : 13.000000 > Diff at pixel (284, 0) : 17.000000 > Diff at pixel (172, 1) : 22.000000 > Diff at pixel (265, 1) : 31.000000 > Diff at pixel (301, 6) : 32.000000 > Diff at pixel (388, 37) : 38.000000 > Diff at pixel (118, 319) : 40.000000 > Max diff : 40 > Number of diffs : 3683 > fail > TEST: test_gdalwarp_34 ... success > > On Aug 23, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > PSC members, please vote for the following motion after conducting your > > own testing. > > Non-PSC members please let us know if you discover problems. > > > > --- > > > > Motion: The GDAL/OGR 1.10.1RC1 package is promoted as the > > final GDAL/OGR 1.10.1 release. > > > > +1 Even > > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Geospatial professional services http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
