A long standing (2011) issue with GDAL's CRS support is its awkward support for 
the Web Mercator projection.  In short, when gdal internally represents this 
CRS (EPSG code 3857), it does so using the Mercator_1SP projection on the WGS84 
datum (not a sphere).  Since that's not quite right, it provides the right math 
to Proj4 via an "Extension."  Some widely used GIS applications won't recognize 
the resulting output  as Web Mercator leading to projection / alignment 
problems.  http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3962 describes the issue more 
fully.  

I've submitted a patch (attached to above ticket) that implements proper 
support for this very widely used projection.  It's seen limited testing here 
at LizardTech and I can confirm that both ERDAS and ArcGIS (and QGIS, but I 
think they were ok to begin with) recognize the resulting representation.  We 
at LT discussed this internally and decided that because it is a fairly 
wide-reaching change, we would provide the patch but not to commit it ourselves 
-- at least not without some discussion from the community.

I should say that the extent of the change is mostly confined to the way it 
creates a WKT representing Web Mercator.  In particular, it does not change the 
way the tiff driver writes tags.  I think the current implementation is 
non-standard (*) but has the weight of history on its side, so I left that 
alone.  However, the change does read (non-standard) tif files that say "epsg 
3857" as Web Mercator.

(*) Perhaps necessarily non-standard.  AFAICT, there is  no standard-compliant 
way to represent this in GeoTiff.  the specification seems to preclude 
referencing an EPSG code outside the range of 20000 – 32760.  Note that the 
existing implementation in libGeoTiff writes ‘3857’ in the 
ProjectedCSTypeGeoKey and notes it is ‘unknown.’  It appears that everyone just 
assumes that if there’s an epsg code there then it must be authoritative.


msr
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

Reply via email to