On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote:
> Now my turn for questions : > - From your questions, I suppose you only consider the vector side of GPKG ? Yes, that's my initial target. Any comments/ideas on how to share functionality between GDAL and OGR drivers, since presumably eventually the gpkg support will end up with one of each. > - Do you intend in writing everything from scratch, or did you consider using > https://bitbucket.org/luciad/libgpkg ? Which is, AFAIK, the equivalent of > libspatialite for GPKG. Contains the SQL functions mandated by the spec, the > triggers etc. I think most of the storage/retrieval stuff is going to be from scratch. The more operational stuff, like rtree index bindings and so on, could/should lean on the luciad code (though I don't actually see those mentioned). I'm loath to add a build dependency, but perhaps copying the tree into the driver would be acceptable? (Except it's a cmake project, and gdal is not, hm) What was your thought? P > Even > > -- > Geospatial professional services > http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
