On 08/02/2014 07:11, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
I've run into a problem that I think is related to a change in the EPSG definition for EPSG:32662 The symptom is that the image after gdalwarp reprojection is about 20km south of where it should be.
Please post the gdalwarp command you have used. (I mean, with both CRS). The problem is likely on the other CRS. _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
