Hi all, recently I started to write a new OGR driver for specific national exchange format which based on GML. I started studying code of GML and NAS driver which are both based on IGMLDriver. I discovered that part of the code is duplicated in NASDriver compared to GMLDriver. The differencies are usually little and 99% of the code is identical, for example - SaveClass() - NAS [1] and GML [2]. There could be probably a middle class same for NAS and GML driver (and probably also for the driver I am currently writing) - at least when loading or saving classes into GFS file...
What do you think? Martin [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/gml/gmlreader.cpp#L1247 [2] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/nas/nasreader.cpp#L804 -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
