Even, I briefly looked at it the other day. My only nit was it seems a little confusing to have a GetNextFeature on both the Dataset and the Layer. Is one always better than the other? Which one should I use when? Should I always use Dataset::GetNextFeature() and let it forward down to OGRLayer::GetNextFeature()? The RFC is clear about those questions, but people don't read the docs :) Is it possible and more clear to rename it?
Its need also suggest this is adding some messiness in the relationship of Dataset <-> Layer. I suppose there's not much we can do about that. Howard > On Oct 3, 2016, at 2:49 AM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> wrote: > > If nobody has remarks on it, I'll call for a vote on this on Wednesday. > > Even > >> Hi, >> >> This is a call for discussion on "RFC 66: OGR random layer read/write >> capabilities" : >> >> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc66_randomlayerreadwrite >> >> This RFC introduces a new API to be able to iterate over vector features at >> dataset level, in addition to the existing capability of doing it at the >> layer level. The existing capability of writing features in layers in >> random order, that is supported by most drivers with output capabilities, >> is formalized with a new dataset capability flag. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
