On lundi 21 août 2017 14:30:15 CEST Sean Gillies wrote: > Hi Even, > > This seems reasonable to me. > > What will be done about the GeoJSON driver case, where we have one driver > covering both GeoJSON and EsriJSON (and other JSONs)? If a user specifies > foo.json which of the GeoJSON driver modes do they activate?
Hi Sean, Exactly like when you specify -f GeoJSON, ie "true" GeoJSON (there's only write support for GeoJSON in the driver. EsriJSON and TopJSON are read-only currently). If you need explicit RFC7946 compliance, you'll still need to add -lco RFC7946=YES Even > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Even Rouault <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This is a call for discussion on: > > > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc70_output_format_guess > > > > > > > > Summary: > > > > This proposal is to add syntaxic sugar to make GDAL and OGR command line > > utilities, so they take into account the extension of the output filename > > to guess which output driver to use, when it is not explicitly specified. > > > > > > > > Even > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > > > > http://www.spatialys.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gdal-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
