On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 3:21 PM Javier Jimenez Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> My two cents: > > About NGS / NOAA, I know that the new CRS they are preparing for 2022 it > clearly time dependent. I attended an online conference (oriented to > surveyors) last year about it, and they insisted a lot on the time variable > and plates drift. > There are some of them in the PROJ mailing list (maybe here as well) > -there was a discussion about including some grid files in PROJ-data-. > Maybe involving them in this topic may produce more traction. > I'm not sure the issue is whether people expect to use time-marked CRS. It's more whether GDAL should attempt to add their support into formats not built for it. I also wonder if people who create time-marked files from GDAL will be confused/mislead when those files aren't properly read by other software. -- Andrew Bell [email protected]
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
