I'd give LZW a go. I've got very good experience with that, in terms of
performance on weaker or embedded systems. However, some people still
think that the algorithm has a protection by patents.
Am 30.09.2021 um 15:46 schrieb Even Rouault:
should we enable a default compression scheme for the COG driver ? I've
heard people "complaining" about that, or people just not realizing that
specifying a compression method was something reasonable to do. Likely a
lossless one to be conservative. ZSTD is probably not reasonable as it's
too non-standard outside of the GDAL/libtiff world. So the choice would
go basically between LZW or DEFLATE. LZW has probably the best
compatibility profile (but the less efficient). I guess that most
browser based solutions would handle it ? Thoughts ?
Even
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
