Why gdb sssso ugly when has deal with inline functions? Warning: Cannot insert breakpoint 2. Error accessing memory address 0x115: Input/Output error.
Why rather gcc so ugly with them? Why you just not substitute inlining with non-inlining ones but with different names overriding http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_mangling Name mangling when you just compile with -g/-ggdb or like this??? Like you did before overriding breakpoints for template functions? And no linker errors while compiling! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/gdb-in-inline-functions-tp28659355p28659355.html Sent from the Gnu - gdb - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
