On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:07:53 +0200, Andreas wrote: >On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:01:13 +0200 >Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Or the other way round, I think it's doesn't really matter if you try >> to implement it in Geany or as a plugin. Taking the working code and >> port it into Geany from a plugin or port it from Geany into a plugin >> shouldn't be that hard at all. > >I think I might start with a plugin, when I find some time. I have some >ideas for added functionalities already. >But I might bother you with some more questions here then ...:-)
That's one of the reasons why this list exists :). >> Additionally, I doubt using the Gedit plugin with a possible future >> Python interface will work out of the box. > >I also doubt that. The different editor-control for one should make >quite a difference. Exactly. Though probably parts of the concept of the plugin can be transferred. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpOy8Cx3phhE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
