On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Nick Treleaven <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:57:11 -0400 > Seth Keiper <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Have you seen the HACKING file? >> > >> >> Yes, this is where I got the info to add the COBOL lexr > > OK, it mentions about checking the Scintilla project first, but after > several recent patches I just added a clearer warning. >
Thanks, I really just want to contribute back as much as I am possible. >> > A few points: >> > We use an unmodified version of Scintilla - any changes to the COBOL >> > lexer should be passed to Scintilla before we apply them. Using the C >> > lexer style constants also means we don't have to update and maintain >> > the cobol copies in editor.c. >> > >> I will submit this new lexer to the Scintilla project after the >> changes are made. > > I wasn't clear; there's already a COBOL scintilla lexer - so I think > the Scintilla maintainer would only accept a patch to improve the > existing one. Awesome, I see this in scintzilla 2.01. what needs to happen to get this merged? _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
