On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:47:54 +1000 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I like your idea in general, the only thing I don't like about it is > > that you wouldn't see the patterns in the FIF dialog, which would make > > it a bit unclear what you are searching for. I would propose to have a > > "file types" edit box that would be editable by the user even if no > > project is opened - this makes sense because users might want to > > search for restricted set of files even if they don't use any project. > > By default the pattern could be * to search in every file like now > > (empty edit box should do the same too). Then there would be the 'Use > > project patterns' you propose (not active when no project is open). > > When checked, the "file types" edit box would become inactive but > > filled with the project patterns so it would be visible directly in > > the dialog what the user is searching for. What do you think about it? Sounds good. > Having a filetype pattern in the find in files dialog could be useful. > Note that --include is a GNU grep extension, so a blank file pattern > should be the default and should not generate the option to grep so as > to maintain portability. Geany currently passes a list of all files and directories to Grep. I think it may be best if Geany does the filtering (and hence also the recursing). Also we may want to always filter out hidden files and broken links. Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
