Frank Lanitz wrote: > Using a DVCS was already under discussion with a few pros for using > git. Maybe you can search a bit inside archive of this list. There has > been a huge number of mails around start of June.
I don't particularly like git, but git would be a huge improvement over SVN. > Beside of the advantages/disadvantages mentioned there I don't see that > this will be able to solve the issue, that some of the 'core'devs needs > to review a patch before merging it into official trunk. Assuming for the moment that git (and github) is used, the core devs will probably find it easier to pull patches from other git trees than manually applying patches from the mailing list. Secondly, havin geany in git will make life easier for people like me and Jiří Techet who are keeping a bunch of patches on top of what is currently in SVN (I've currently got a set of 9 quilt patches I apply to whatever is in SVN head). Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
