On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 14:24, Nick Treleaven <nick.trelea...@btinternet.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:30:00 +0200 > Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Attached you'll find a patch that updates the regex library to the >> >> latest version from glibc. This removes the warnings Lex was >> >> experiencing on a 64bit machine. I looked at how ctags does it and >> >> made the patch in a similar way. >> > >> > I'm not sure if the glibc version will build on Windows. I don't have a >> > Windows build environment set up ATM to try it. >> > >> > It might be best to use the version from latest CTags. The >> > gnu_regex/README.txt says: >> > "Minor changes were made to eliminate compiler errors and warnings." >> > >> > Using the same version as CTags could potentially also prevent any >> > regex-incompatibility bugs with CTags parsers. >> >> As far as I remember the CTags version and the glibc version of regex >> are basically the same. > > They're not the same, the diff is significant.
OK, was doing it some time ago so I was probably wrong. > > I think we should use the CTags version. > >> I also changed some symbol name in the regex >> sources because of a conflict with some symbol in my system header >> files. > > What's the conflicting symbol? It was in regex_internal.h - I had to change: # define __mempcpy mempcpy to # define ___mempcpy mempcpy but I expect CTags fixed this somehow too. Regards, Jiri > > Regards, > Nick > _______________________________________________ > Geany-devel mailing list > Geany-devel@uvena.de > http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel > _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
