On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:03:53 +0100, Dominic wrote: >Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 13:03 +0000 schrieb Nick Treleaven: >> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:29:36 +0100 >> Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >Do we plan to update scintilla anytime soon? If not, would it be >> > >> > Nick? >> > Any release plans soon? >> >> Yes, I think we could make the 0.20 release soon. If there are no
Cool. I'll try to get some of the remaining Windows sorted soon. >> > Either we push into trunk and see how it works or in case we are >> > close to a release, I'd push it into a branch for the curious >> > people. >> >> I think it would be best to put it in an 'unstable' branch. Last time >> we updated Scintilla just before the 0.19 release it introduced >> scrolling bugs. I agree. I just created the branch and will commit the updated Scintilla copy soon. >I tend to suggest this right the "inverse way", create a stable branch >to work towards the 0.20 release and continue the "unstable" work in >trunk... True. But we did it with the unstable branch in the past and it doesn't hurt. Not really a pro unstable branch argument but still a convenient side effect: using trunk for creating the Windows binaries is easier than cheching out a new branch :). Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgp3JYVoy034G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
