On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 03:50:29 +0100, Colomban wrote: >Le 06/03/2011 15:49, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >> On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 15:29:24 +0100, Colomban wrote: >> >> >>>> - you use va_copy() in MIO. va_copy is C99 while all the other va_* >>>> functions are C89. So far, we tried to stay compatible with C89 >>>> even though it is old (and it is old, and old). At least some >>>> years ago, there were actually users who had to use a C89 compiler. >>>> Maybe we should just stop C89 support as we are in 2011 in the >>>> meantime... >>> Ah, right... I'll see if I can fix this (e.g. maybe GLib have proper >>> stuff somewhere). >> >> If not, we might simply drop C89 support. >I like C89 :) >And no worries, it's fixed in SVN now: no more va_copy(), no more >vsnprintf(). Thanks for finding this out :)
Just by accident...I just walked over the files to check the includes to ensure we don't miss anything to check for in the build systems. And so stumbled upon va_copy :). Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpj0tNTkIAvF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
