On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:17:26 +1100 Lex Trotman <ele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Currently there is the problem with dropped support for old C++ > >> compilers which may not affect us directly but more over the > >> introduction of new C++0x code. > >> For details see > >> http://groups.google.com/group/scintilla-interest/browse_thread/thread/8f9c4aae5f5c5368/6ecc660f51cecefc. > >> Though Scintilla's release notes state that the Borland C++ support was > >> removed, I'm not sure if the new C++0x code is already in. > >> Nick, Lex, do you know more about the current status? > > > > Good question, thanks Enrico for asking it :) > > Actually there is another patch that was applied to upstream Sinctilla I > > would like to see in our copy (related to Vala highlighting), so I > > wondered if we didn't wanted to update our scintilla copy at some > > point... but there is the C++0x thing. > > > > Well Scintilla 2.25 does not use the std=c++0x option and it does use > -Wall which includes a c++0x warning so I would say its reasonably > safe. Yes, and I'd expect Neil to mention it in the release notes if the requirements change. Now that C++0x has been finalised as C++ 2011 this might encourage him :-/ Regards, Nick _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel