On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:38:23 +0200, Colomban wrote: >Le 13/06/2011 18:55, Frank Lanitz a écrit : >> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:26:06 +0200 >> Enrico Tröger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:38 +0200, Colomban wrote: >>> >>>> Le 04/05/2011 23:00, Enrico Tröger a écrit : >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> any objections in increasing the GTK minimum requirement of Geany >>>>> to GTK 2.12 (and GLib 2.16)? >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>> >>>> Any new on the subject? Should we go on an start moving? >>> >>> Yeah, I'd say let's go! >> >> I second this. > >Okay, let's do then :) >However, I just realized that GTK 2.12 [1] depends on GLib 2.14, not >2.16 [2] as you suggested so... do we depend on GLib 2.14 (as GTK 2.12) >or 2.16 (to get GIO in)?
I wanted GLib 2.16 because of GIO to get rid of #ifdefs. And based on Debian Lenny's GTK/Glib versions, I suggested the combination of GTK 2.12 and GLib 2.16 although they were not released in the same cycle. Btw, Nick is using GTK 2.12, so unless there is a super cool fancy feature in GTK 2.14 we cannot miss, I'd say 2.12 is ok for now. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpWZ6NyJ315c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
