Hi But why only 1.0?
GNOME 3.* KDE 4.* Scite 2.* What about Geany 3000? Or some kind of other stupid release name like ''busel', 'verabei', 'krumkach' ... Best regards, Yura Siamashka On 20/09/2011, Thomas Martitz <thomas.mart...@student.htw-berlin.de> wrote: > Am Di, 20.09.2011, 13:43 schrieb Lex Trotman: >> On 20 September 2011 21:23, Frank Lanitz <fr...@frank.uvena.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 20.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Ji?í Techet: >>>> just one very quick and possibly stupid idea. How about getting rid of >>>> the 0 version prefix and calling the next release 1.0? >>> >>> To make it short: As we are about two weeks ahead of next release I >>> disagree. After 0.21 release we got a lot of structural changes we might >>> could think about a 1.0 too, but I don't feel its needed at the moment. >> >> I have to disagree with you on this Frank, the version number is >> nothing to do with structural or technical issues, it is a project >> issue. Changing the version number doesn't affect translation or >> anything else that takes time to do, so it isn't going to delay the >> release. >> > > > I agree. There's no reason to wait until after the upcoming release. 1.0: > the earlier, the better. > > This release should be the most stable one ever made, so 1.0 is even more > justified. 0.X simply isn't justified anymore. It sounds like Geany was > alpha software, but it has indeed better release quality that the majority > of software out there. > > Best regards. > > _______________________________________________ > Geany-devel mailing list > Geany-devel@uvena.de > https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel > -- Best regards, Yury Siamashka _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel