Hi Jiri, On 5 October 2011 08:37, Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get everything ready for the conversion and there are > still a few points unresolved: > >> I have a few comments (and questions) myself: >> >> 1. Some branch names should be renamed (e.g. Geany-0_19_1) because >> they have the same name as tags and they are ambiguous when doing "git >> checkout". Some naming scheme for stable branches should be invented. > > I was proposing to have two digit branches and three digit tags: > > Geany-0_19 - maintenance branch > Geany-0_19_0 - tag > Geany-0_19_1 - tag > Geany-0_19_2 - tag > > Do you agree or do you prefer some different naming scheme?
I agree. [...] >> >> 5. I kept the bs2 and sm branches in the repository but once the >> migration is done, they should be cloned by their owners and should be >> removed from the main repository. > > I can create official Geany repository without them and one clone that > contains them so their authors can pick them after the conversion. > As bs2 owner I am happy for it to go away, its too out of date. I would start again anyway. I don't own sm, but I hope it will get merged by next version so we need a clone for that. Cheers Lex _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel