On 11-11-04 04:03 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 04/11/2011 23:28, Jiří Techet a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 03:18, Matthew Brush<[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
All on one line:
git filter-branch --msg-filter "sed -e
's|svnroot/geany-plugins/trunk/geany-plugins@|viewvc/geany-plugins\?view=revision\&revision=|'"
HEAD
Works fine at least looking at quite a few of the commits in gitk and has
the advantage of linking to the better ViewVC code browser that SourceForge
offers.
OK, thanks. So is there any "official" conclusion which format should
be used? (I don't have any strong preference here.)
I'd personally prefer to have a valid SVN URL rather than a valid HTTP
link, but again, I don't mind much.
Thanks for pointing out now *after* so much time and discussion that the
existing URL *was a valid SVN URL*. I'm glad I wasted my time :)
</sarcasm>
@Jiri
I'd say it's your call, in light of this new information, I'd say leave
it as is and get it done as soon as you have time (assuming no one else
objects).
Cheers,
Matthew Brush
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
