Lex Trotman wrote: > But if the level of interest is indicated by the responses, then not > many people use these snippets,
I've been a Geany user for about 18 months. I code in C, C++, Ocaml and Haskell regularly and touch dozens of other languages semi regularly. Personally I think languages like Haskell don't really need snippets as the language itself is already terse. However, the existing snippets that work for C/C++/Java/etc are actually a pain in the neck when coding Haskell. In C and C++, the snippets don't get in my way, but I wouldn't miss them if they weren't there. For HTML and XML I actually do like the snippets. They're sane and they help. > so maybe it isn't worth the effort of > either approach and just repeat things for now and possibly over time > the definitions will diverge. I think this will be the case. > > Why keep an empty [Haskell] section? > > Again I expected proposals for some proper Haskell ones, but again > looks like no-one uses snippets much. The language is super terse, with little un-necessary punctuation. I'd be happy with no snippets. If I find something that should be a Haskell snippet I'll be sure to let you know. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list Geany-devel@uvena.de https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel