On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:43:10 +1100 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 09:44, Thomas Martitz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am 24.02.2012 23:34, schrieb Lex Trotman: > > > >> I don't agree with this change, the types are just that, types, not > >> keywords, they should not be highlighted as keywords. They are not > >> always available. This change should be reverted. > >> > > > > The list contained types before the commit and the commit just > > added more for completeness. > > > > I suggest using the secondary for types instead. > > Yes, good idea, if I understand the comment in > highlightingmappings.h:206 it is meant for types. > > Cheers > Lex > > PS the existing list contains the fundamental types that are always > available without headers, these new ones need a header (though size_t > is used so much that almost any header will do :) I did like that idea adding more often used one. But you are right cleaning up a bit and maybe resorting them would be might a ice idea. Cheers, Frank -- http://frank.uvena.de/en/
pgpamRXvTZa9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel
