On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:22:50 -0700, Jason Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, that's the problem. ;) They should be styled differently, since > they are not entirely equivalent. The use of two colons on the > pseudo-elements (and the fact that they need to appear AFTER any > pseudo-classes, if they exist) are not handled by Scintilla, so far > as I know. Although, the two colons thing wasn't even suggested until > CSS3. > > But like I said, I wouldn't mind working on the Scintilla side of > this one if you guys want to handle Geany's keywords. It just needs > pseudo-classes and pseudo-elements separated, and whatever list of This is kind of independent. At the very first stage, Scintilla, i.e. LexCSS needs to separate between pseudo-elements and pseudo-attributes. Then we can define lists of those in Geany. Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgpWSfDjPg36A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
