On Tuesday 01 September 2009 02:23:39 pm Enrico Tröger wrote:
> Well, I completely understand your issue. And basically I tend to
> agree that a fixed width is not good. OTOH I just like the reduced
> width as it does read better for me on my widescreen (as already
> pointed out). But yes, not everybody has a widescreen, not everybody
> likes tiny fonts as I do and so on.
>
> So, maybe we should indeed remove the fixed width to make it easier
> for most users to read.

Lex made/found a suggestion to change the line:
                width: 60em;
to:
                max-width: 60em;

And that seems to work well for me and for him--if it works for you, 
that seems to be a good solution.  (I haven't spent much time testing 
it, but it's hard to imagine what could go wrong...bad move, hunh ;-)

Randy Kramer


_______________________________________________
Geany mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany

Reply via email to