On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:06:34 +0100 Dominic Hopf <[email protected]> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 11:29 +0100 schrieb Krzysztof > Żelechowski: > > Dnia czwartek, 30 grudnia 2010 o 04:53:02 Kete napisał(a): > > > The GPL seems weird for a webpage to have in its source code because I > > > don't > > > think of webpages as programs or "software" as the template says. Why is > > > the > > > GPL used for a webpage? I understand it's good for some of the other > > > things > > > that people use Geany to make because those are actual programs. Would > > > the > > > GNU Free Documentation License or a Creative Commons license be more > > > applicable for webpages? I think I might make some more templates with > > > one of > > > these licenses and/or the HTML 5 format. > > > > If a web page contains script, e.g. to write the markup in the browser, the > > script might be under GPL as well. > > In that case the AGPL may be better, since it guarantees the source to > be open. With GPL it would be possible to run a server-side program > without having the sources public... GPLv2 yes, GPLv3 is having some progress at this point ;) Cheers, Frank -- Frank Lanitz <[email protected]>
pgp7TIJkBlBGC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
