On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:40:30 +1000, Russell wrote: >On 1 April 2011 11:07, Randy Kramer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thursday 31 March 2011 01:43:52 pm Enrico Tröger wrote: >>> The question about the Wiki software to use is still unanswered if I >>> didn't miss anything. >>> >>> I personally still would prefer DokuWiki or PMWiki. >>> >>> Any opinions? >> >> Of course! ;-) >> >> I'd recommend choosing a wiki which uses a markup language for which >> Geany can do syntax highlighting. I find it helpful to write my wiki >> pages in my own editor before transferring them to the wiki. >> >> I prefer Foswiki / TWiki, but there is not a lexer for them in >> Geany / SciTE, yet. (I'm working on one, but no promises on >> completion.) >> >> Randy Kramer > > >While I agree that it would be great if wiki contributions could be >written in Geany but I don't think that should limit our wiki >selection.
There is a MarkDown plugin for DokuWiki which seems to work quite ok (just tested it on a test instance) and there is also a not yet released RestructuredText plugin[1]. I contacted the author already asking him whether he would release it as we could use it. Geany supports both, MarkDown and RestructuredText. I personally hope the RestructuredText plugin will appear and be useful, as I know ReST better than MarkDown or any Wiki syntax and because we use ReST as well for Geany's documentation. >+1 for Dokuwiki. Nice. [1] http://www.freelists.org/post/dokuwiki/Howwhere-does-dokuwiki-handle-file-suffixes-I-want-to-automate-rst-files,3 Regards, Enrico -- Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
pgphYZ8aCB8bm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
