On 6 June 2011 22:15, Randy Kramer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday 05 June 2011 10:42:41 pm Lex Trotman wrote: >> > That's how I understood your proposal, Matthew, and I think it's a >> > good idea. The newsletter should be published in its original >> > format for future reference. However the content which has a useful >> > life past the publication date of the newsletter certainly could >> > and I think *should* be in the wiki. >> > >> > The benefit of this approach is: >> > >> > * HowTo information is highlighted in the newsletter and is easily >> > read and understood; >> > * Anyone who can edit the wiki is able to contribute to the >> > newsletter; * Useful reference information remains in the wiki, to >> > be added to and enhanced over time. >> > >> > I currently write the newsletter of Frugalware Linux. Over the few >> > years I've been writing, I have written some things which are still >> > useful reference information. However they're contained in the >> > newsletter, not the wiki and so not easily found, nor edited. >> > Putting this information first into the wiki would have avoided >> > this problem. >> >> +1 Agree with all you said. > +1 > > Randy Kramer
I'm amazed that (1) people understood what I wrote, (2) that two people agree with what I wrote. -- Russell Dickenson _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
