On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:36:31 +1000 Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As Stephan mentioned in his mail, this path could be replaced by the > > path of the project file (he called it virtual root). Why? Just > > because I have more than one working directory. I have a development > > release and one or more branches / customer releases checked out. If > > the project file would use the virtual root, I would have only one > > project file to load. > > > > I'm not sure I totally understand you, if the project file is in the > vcs and the base path is relative to the project file why do you have > to copy it? OK. I thought, that the base path must be absolute. But to get the expected behavior, I must use . as base path, which seams to work here on linux. The session informations stored in section [files] are still using an absolute path. Is this the point where a project option you've mentioned could help? -- Email: Joerg Desch <jd DOT vvd AT web DOT de> _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
