On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Brush <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12-09-07 05:13 PM, Matthew Brush wrote: >> >> On 12-09-07 04:55 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Matthew Brush <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 12-09-07 02:06 PM, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Lex Trotman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7 September 2012 12:50, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been using geany for a couple months and really like it as my >>>>>>> nedit >>>>>>> replacement, but I'm running into an annoying problem that I'm not >>>>>>> sure >>>>>>> how >>>>>>> to resolve. I maintain a "running notes" file in my public_html >>>>>>> directory, >>>>>>> its extension is one of our invisible php includes but I don't >>>>>>> want the >>>>>>> file >>>>>>> syntax-highlighting as a php file, I want to be able to create a >>>>>>> plaintext >>>>>>> file type that I can select that has basically no formatting >>>>>>> whatsoever. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If the extension you use doesn't apply to anything you want >>>>>> highlighted then you can take it out of the filetypes.extensions file >>>>>> so it won't be recognised as a filetype. >>>>>> >>>>>> Otherwise you can set the filetype to none and it should not highlight >>>>>> anything menu->document->set filetype->none >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Lex >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the suggestions, Lex, Matthew, unfortunately the issue I >>>>> mentioned below occurs even when I set the filetype to "none" (via >>>>> menu->document->set filetype->none). Digging through the preferences >>>>> again, I ran across "use indicators to show compile errors" and the >>>>> hover-tip explains that it underlines with the squiggly underline that >>>>> I'm seeing, but I have that setting turned off. It's strange because I >>>>> have geany installed on my centos box and my winxp box, and as far as >>>>> I can tell, the preferences for both are set up the same, but the <? >>>>> in the same file triggers the indicator in the centos geany only. Is >>>>> there something else I can try? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It could be that the CentOS version is really old and maybe there >>>> used to be >>>> a bug that is since fixed. Or maybe you have plugin on the CentOS box >>>> that's >>>> doing it but it's not installed in the Windows version. You can also >>>> remove >>>> the markers/error indicators using Document menu->Remove Markers and >>>> Remove >>>> Error Indicators, though likely they will come back later from >>>> whatever is >>>> causing the squiggles to show up. >>>> >>>> Otherwise, I don't know. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Matthew Brush >>> >>> >>> Sigh. Yar, old version. Just checked and winxp version is 1.22, centos >>> is 0.20. >>> >> >> Even if it sounds like a big difference, versions went 0.20, 0.21, 1.22 >> so it's not *that* old, but still kind of old :) >> >>> Re the removing error indicators, I tried that as soon as I saw the >>> explanation of what they were, but it didn't work either. >>> >> >> That makes it sound like a plugin might be putting error indicators, >> since using the menu to remove should always remove the ones Geany puts >> there itself AFAIK. >> >>> I'm using the RPMforge version, the EPEL version is 0.21... I don't >>> suppose anyone happens to know if another repo has a newer version? >>> I'd like to have this be my default nedit replacement, which would >>> mean it gets dumped onto about 20 centos boxes, and I'd really rather >>> not have to do manual installs for it.... >>> >> >> I don't know any, unless you can use Fedora packages or something. >> Compiling from source isn't too painful if you can install GTK+ >> development stuff from pre-built packages, though doing it on 20 boxes >> might be tedious. Maybe you can compile on one box and make your own >> package? I have no idea what's involved for CentOS to do this. >> > > Actually, linked from the 3rd party packages page on Geany website is this: > > http://www.melvilletheatre.com/articles/el6/index.html > > It seems to have latest Geany 1.22 for CentOS, but I've no clue if it's any > good or will post your bank account info on Facebook before deleting your > hard drive (hence being under 3rd party pacakges) :) > > Cheers, > Matthew Brush >
Yeah, ~blush~, let's just say that I just figured out I'd downloaded those third party rpms when I was installing the first time around, and somehow or another I still managed to install the out-dated 0.20 version. While looking at the third-party rpms, I also realised that the el5 version is the same as the rpmforge version, only the el6 version is using 1.22. I have just finished yum-removing the 0.20 version (since yum would not let me update to 1.22 directly) and then yum-installing the newer version. I am now looking at my delightfully plain and simple notes file :D YAY! Much appreciate the help from you and Lex, you guys got me pointed in the right direction :D Thanks! Miranda _______________________________________________ Geany mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany
