Great idea. I like that a lot.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 19:09, Michael Nordman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like it... with our current blob api, it's impossible to compose a > multipart form submission that contains binary parts... a big omission... > this makes that possible. And this also maintains immutability of blobs > which i think is a good thing. > A companion sample that contains a javascript class to construct a properly > formed multipart encoded blob would be nice too... where to put how many > crlf's and how to use the boundary string in the payload as well as the > content-type header are obscure details that webapp developers usually don't > have to deal with. > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Nigel Tao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:44, Chris Prince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Whoa, this happened suddenly. If this goes out, it may be the Gears >> > API that has undergone the least design scrutiny! >> >> Indeed, that did happen far suddenlier [1] than I was expecting. >> Still, like any non OFFICIAL_BUILD code, we're free to improve the >> BlobBuilder API after an initial check-in. >> >> [1] yes, suddenlier is a perfectly cromulent word. > >
