This is not a "security risk". You are asked if you allow gears for
that site. Nothing is hidden. It is like I make a site with a link
asking: "Do you want to download and run my_virus.exe?" If you say
yes, you got my virus.  There are many "security risks" if the user
just accepts all the warnings that he got, Gears brings nothing new.

On Apr 15, 8:13 pm, meanderingthemaze <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have been googling about potential security risks associated with
> the end-users' use of Gears. Strangely, Google seems to not be making
> any public comments on this subject. If I'm wrong, please direct me to
> where they discuss it.
>
> As they are trying to court developers by "opening up" the code, they
> are also allowing others to possibly exploit this brand new idea that
> people don't know much about. I can't imagine that Google has not
> considered this, but is it not a little irresponsible to not address
> these things if they are allowing others to exploit this technology.
> Afterall, many people will most likely believe things are safer
> because it says Google.
>
> I did find some articles by others pointing out security issues.
>
> For my personal use, I will have the common sense to not just allow
> any site to use gears (in fact, I am only using gears with GApps.) But
> I'm sure many less careful people will be jumping on the Gears ship
> because it sounds cool, or it might just be a curiosity.
>
> Does anyone have nay more info on this topic?

Reply via email to