We've definitely considered item 2, in that we want to offer inline replies (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4554). However, it's not explicit in that ticket that you should be able to switch between Reply and Reply All. I've added that at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5957
Item 1 is something that's occurred to me as well but it never got ticketed. Done that here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5958 I think these are both fine ideas. I hope we can get to them both in the next cycle. -- Jim On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Cassidy James <[email protected]> wrote: I'd be interested in some design feedback about 1, but 2 sounds like a great idea. I like how in Gmail I can switch it to reply all and it preserves the message text. On Oct 3, 2012 3:19 AM, "Stuart Langridge" wrote: > A couple of odd little ideas I've had which Geary might implement: > > 1. If I reply to a message and there were multiple recipients, then > modelessly tell me that maybe I meant to Reply All, so I don't forget > 2. If I've replied to a message, allow me to switch it to Reply All > without having to abandon and recreate my reply or manually add the > other people. And vice versa, of course. > > Thoughts? > > sil > > -- > New Year's Day -- > everything is in blossom! > I feel about average. > -- Kobayashi Issa > _______________________________________________ > Geary mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geary > _______________________________________________ Geary mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geary _______________________________________________ Geary mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geary
