Hi David, it is some time ago, but I think we had the same issue (at checker in base class). we had implemented a dummy at checker in each concrete class just calling super. the reason for this was that it seems that geb is only calling at when it is another implementation, so using an at checker in a base class does not work. I'm not 100% sure but maybe this helps you.
Dennis Am Dienstag, 19. Juli 2016 00:35:46 UTC+2 schrieb David Lumpkin: > > Hi Geb Users, > > Have you found an efficient way to inherit at checker closures? An > application I'm working with is very asynchronous but has a javascript > variable it sets when the page is ready to interact with. Currently I am > including this check in each of my at checkers, but I'd like to set it in a > superclass that gets executed for each page that extends the superclass. > Have any of you done something like this? I was thinking about extending > the verifyThisPageAtOnly method but figured I'd ask here first to see if > anyone has advice. > > Thanks, > -David > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geb User Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geb-user/7de44560-9639-42c3-9c3d-ff38b61bf9dd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
