No, unfortunately for you, they are not automagically merged in any way. There are ways around it so if you tell me a bit more about your usecase I might be able to give you some pointers.
As a side note, can you please explain how you’d expect the at checkers to behave if they were merged? Maybe we can create an issue for it and improve on the current situation. On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Lubomír Zrnečko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > how does 'at' verification work for subclasses? Is it similar with > 'content' so all 'at' statements in page class hierarchy are merged to one > and then evaluated? > I would expect to be so but I don't see this behavior in my setup. > Thanks for your help > Best regards > Lubomir > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Geb User Mailing List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geb-user/7e17dbda-c53e-4533-a3e0-d5b8aba335bb%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geb-user/7e17dbda-c53e-4533-a3e0-d5b8aba335bb%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Geb User Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geb-user/CA%2B52dQT3BR7u%3Dz7TEUx-srvQ675hvBSzCeG10skgvdkdBd9Nkg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
